ISLAMABAD:
Government ministers, in their deliberations on Musharraf’s request to
remove his name from the Exit Control List (ECL), have referred to the
case of an ex-diplomat who despite the commitment given to the apex
court never returned to face trial.
Sources told The
News that during intense discussions among the top government leadership
on Tuesday, some ministers opposed those who were making a case for
allowing Musharraf to leave the country after “he became ready to be
indicted” by arguing that the PML-N will lose face forever and the
remaining part of the trial will become a mere joke. Musharraf is facing
charges of treason for abrogating and breaching the Constitution on
November 3, 2007.
However, a senior PML-N minister told
The News that the top ruling party leadership had not reached any
decision on Tuesday and there would be another top-level meeting on
Wednesday. The statement of this top minister of Nawaz cabinet only
certifies that Musharraf will not leave the country, at least on Tuesday
night or Wednesday morning.
The former diplomat was
allowed to leave the country by the Supreme Court for a short period
after strong assurances given by himself and his lawyer on January 30,
2012. To get his name removed from the Exit Control List, the former
diplomat had submitted an application through his counsel before a
nine-member larger bench, headed by the then Chief Justice Iftikhar
Muhammad Chaudhry, and volunteered to return to Pakistan any time on
four-day notice to join the proceedings, if and when required to do so.
On the basis of these assurances, he had sought from the apex court the
removal of his name from the Exit Control List, so that he could travel
outside Pakistan and join his family abroad.
According to
sources, even now some PML-N leaders, due to certain pressure, want to
allow Musharraf to leave the country after giving ‘assurances’ that he
will return when required. Others say that even those putting forward
this suggestion know that he will never return.
The
former diplomat had feared that his life might be in danger if he came
back. On the other hand, Musharraf, to avoid court appearances while
being in Pakistan, has repeatedly taken the plea that his life was in
danger.
After leaving the country, the former diplomat
refused to return despite all assurances. Later, on July 9, 2012, the
Supreme Court summoned him to appear before the apex court on July 12,
2012 but he never turned up.
Similarly, on November 12,
2012, when the former diplomat did not appear on grounds of security
concerns, the apex court summoned the federal secretary interior on
November 13, 2012, who assured foolproof security but the former
diplomat still never came to Pakistan.
Then on June 4,
2013, a larger bench of the Supreme Court directed the federal
government to use all legal and constitutional measures to bring the
former diplomat back to Pakistan. Interestingly, the counsel for the
former diplomat told the Supreme Court that as one of the petitioners
against her client, Muhammad Nawaz Sharif, was set to become the prime
minister of Pakistan, so he could not come to Pakistan because of severe
security threats.
The Supreme Court order to bring the
former diplomat was directed to the Nawaz Sharif government but the
record establishes that no effort was made through diplomatic channels
to bring him back. It is obvious that if the Nawaz government was unable
to bring the former diplomat back, who enjoyed very little backing of
foreign rulers as compared to Musharraf, it would be unable to do
anything in the case of Musharraf.
Though saner elements
in the cabinet are advising the top leadership to save the public image
and credibility of the party, sources say the leadership is inclined to
allow Musharraf to flee. No one was ready to speak on the record from
the federal government’s side.
While those who
participated in Tuesday’s deliberations say that the top leadership is
now ready to allow Musharraf to go, the party’s Central Secretary
Information Senator Mushahidullah Khan says that the final decision will
be taken in the “next meeting”. When asked by The News when this next
meeting would be held, Mushahidullah said that it could be held anytime.
When told that a senior minister had informed The News that the next
meeting would be held on Wednesday, Mushahidullah said, “No. It could be
held any time, even tonight (the night between Tuesday and Wednesday)
or it can be delayed.”
Mushahidullah Khan was told by The
News that the senior PML-N leadership was confirming that the decision
to allow Musharraf to leave the country had been taken and would be
announced and defended publicly at an appropriate time. Will such a
decision hurt the credibility of a leading democratic party of the
country? Mushahidullah said that as the decision would be taken in the
next meeting, so he would comment after that and any comment on the
credibility of the party before the next meeting would be unfair.
Mushahidullah’s
tone was subdued and apparently he was preparing himself to defend his
party in the public for helping a dictator flee the country at a time
when the judiciary has indicted him in the high-treason trial.