ISLAMABAD:
As the PTI chief Imran Khan shows his intent to even go to the extent of
dissolving the KP government if his demand for verification of votes in
four constituencies is not met, the Election Commission of Pakistan has
categorically said that such a decision could only be taken by the
Election Tribunals and no one else.
Without going into
the political aspects of the matter, Secretary ECP Ishtiaq Ahmad told
The News here on Wednesday that what the PTI was demanding with respect
to the recounting of votes in four NA constituencies purely fell in the
jurisdiction of Election Tribunals.
As per the law and the
Constitution, the secretary ECP explained, the verification of the
votes and their recounting could only be ordered by the Election
Tribunals. When asked if the government or the Election Commission could
do this as demanded by the PTI, the ECP secretary said that he had
explained what the law and the Constitution says.
Under
the law, he said the ECP can order recounting and even re-election in
any constituency where it is convinced of prima facie irregularity but
it could be done only within 60 days of the elections. After the lapse
of this period all such matters have to be dealt by the Election
Tribunals.
Although Ishtiaq Ahmad avoided to directly
respond to the question if the government or the ECP could seek
re-counting or re-election on their own, another senior official of the
Commission on condition of not being named said that it could not happen
under the law and the constitution.
The source added that
neither the government has any legal or constitutional right to refer
such a matter to the ECP nor the Commission has any mandate to entertain
such a request from the government.
Under the law only
the Election Tribunals, and not the Election Commission of Pakistan
(ECP) or the government, are empowered to order rechecking, recounting
or verification of any poll related documents to ascertain their
authenticity.
Section 46 of the Representation of Peoples
Act (ROPA) 1976 envisages that a tribunal may order inspection of any
counted ballot papers or opening of packets of counterfoils and
certificates.
The law says that such an order may be made
subject to such conditions as to persons, time, place and mode of
inspection, production of documents and opening of packets as the
concerned tribunal may think expedient. In making and carrying into
effect an order for the inspection of counted ballot papers, care will
be taken that no vote will be disclosed until it has been held by the
tribunal to be invalid.
Where such an order is passed, the
production by the ECP of any document in such manner as may be directed
will be conclusive evidence that the document relates to that specific
election, according to the law. Any endorsement on any ballot papers or
their packet papers or documents so made available will be prima facie
evidence that the ballots or documents are what the endorsement states
them to be.
The National Database & Registration
Authority (Nadra), which has expressed its readiness to do verification
of thumb impressions, will come into play to do this job only if an
Election Tribunal ordered so.
It can’t do so on its own or
on the direction of the government. The ECP also has no authority to
seek such authentication under the law.Any person aggrieved by the
decision of a tribunal may, within 30 days, appeal to the Supreme Court.
Under
Section 103AA of ROPA, if, from facts apparent on the face of the
record and after such summary inquiry as it may deem necessary, the ECP
is satisfied that, by reason of grave illegalities or violation of the
ROPA or the rules, the poll in any constituency ought to be declared
void, it may make a declaration accordingly and order re-election. While
exercising this power, the ECP will be deemed to be a tribunal to which
an election petition has been presented.
But, according
to ROPA, the ECP may exercise this power before the expiration of 60
days after publication of the name of the concerned returned candidate
in the official gazette. Where it does not finally dispose of such a
case within this period, the election of such contestant will be deemed
to have become final, subject to a decision of a tribunal.