ISLAMABAD:
Though interior minister Chaudhry Nisar Ali Khan has done some sober
firefighting to resolve irritants between the civilian and the military
leadership, much depends on the overtures of the two Sharifs - Nawaz and
Raheel - leading the two sides to normalise their relationship.
Since
General Raheel Sharif’s disputed public rejoinder to the contentious
statements of two federal ministers - Kh Asif and Kh Saad Rafiq —
matters have turned quite bad. Certain vested interests, including the
overt and covert supporters of General Musharraf, are doing their
devious best to exploit the situation in their favour no matter how it
hurts Pakistan and its institutions.
Background
interactions reveal that in view of the recent rise in tensions, both
sides do not want to aggravate the situation. However, there is no hint
how the present gap between the two would be bridged.According to one
source, informal contacts between the two sides have already been made
but such interactions are not being made public.
According
to one of the most relevant federal ministers in this dispute, things
can be settled even without the involvement of Prime Minister Nawaz
Sharif. It is said that some ministers might contact the military
leadership to remove the misunderstandings.
However, it
is suspected that besides Musharraf’s men there are elements dubbed as
“ISI within ISI”, who are crossing the limits and misusing their
official positions in their support for Musharraf.
The
challenge for Prime Minister Nawaz and Army Chief General Raheel is to
identify such elements within the intelligence agencies to ensure that
anyone representing these institutions, which are set-up as the first
defence against any attack on country’s sovereignty and security, does
not use the agency’s official muscles to serve and secure the vested
interest of any individual.
In order to avoid
misunderstandings in the future, the Prime Minister and the Army would
have to resolve their complete support to rule of law, upholding of the
constitution and respect for institutions.
Musharraf’s
case is a test of rule of law in Pakistan and here the Army chief would
have to make his ranks and file understand that the dictator’s case is
before the independent judiciary and it is the court that has to decide
his fate.
Prime Minister Nawaz would have to bound his
party leaders and ministers not to say anything that may be interpreted
by the soldiers as an attack on the institution of Pakistan Army. Kh
Asif and Kh Saad Rafique though did not say anything against the Army
many believe their tone and tenor even against Musharraf was un-called
for.
Since Musharraf’s case is before the Special Court,
it is inappropriate on the part of the government ministers’ to try the
dictator publicly. Both the government and military have to leave
Musharraf’s case to the courts to decide without entertaining any
request for a deal.
Musharraf’s lawyers before and during
the case and after the indictment of their client have named military
many a time in their remarks. They should not have used the name of
military.
More importantly, despite the past or even the
present wrongs of the institutions whether it is army, ISI or any other
agency, parliament, government or the judiciary, the institutions
should be protected by drawing a clear line between the institutions and
individuals.
Instead of targeting the institutions, rouge
elements who use their state given resources to impact events without
any accountability or check and balance or oversight, should be
identified and corrected.
These people may be doing it for
their “right intentions” or maybe they are confused between their
loyalty to individuals like Musharraf and to institution and to country
and to rule of law and constitution.
On the one hand
strengthening of democratic norms within the limits as envisaged by the
Islamic constitution of Pakistan is the need of the hour and, on the
other, Pakistan requires a strong but apolitical Army for the defence
and security of the country. Things could move smoothly for a better
future of Pakistan only if all institutions remain within their
constitutional limits and this is what the two Sharifs have to realise
and ensure.