The Hindu
Delays in environmental and forest clearances occurred mostly in the
Bhubaneswar-based Mahanadi Coalfields Ltd. (MCL), which accounted for
10.5 million tonnes of the 12 million tonnes lost.
Around 12 million tonnes of coal was lost due to the absence of regulatory clearances in 2013-14 The Hindu has learnt.
This
accounts for nearly 60 per cent of the 19.5 million tonne shortfall
reported by Coal India Ltd (CIL) in the just closed financial year.
Enquiries
revealed that of the 19.5 million tonnes, five million tonnes was lost
due to Cyclone Phailin, two million tonnes due to CIL’s internal
reasons, while as much as 12 million tonnes was lost due to delays in
environment and forest clearances by the Central and State governments.
Delays
in environmental and forest clearances occurred mostly in the
Bhubaneswar-based Mahanadi Coalfields Ltd. (MCL), which accounted for
10.5 million tonnes of the 12 million tonnes lost. However, it also
occurred in Northern Coalfields Ltd based in Varanasi and South Eastern
Coalfields Ltd based in Chhattisgarh’s Bilaspur.
The single largest loss, of 6 million tonnes, was due to the delay in forest clearance at the Bharatpur Colliery in MCL.
“Since
we already had on hand the Stage I clearances, we had expected the
Stage II clearance, which is really just a formality, by October 2013.
But this came in February 2014. We had environment clearance for 15
million tonnes but we had land only for 6 million tonnes and needed
forest clearance for the remaining portion,” a senior official said, who
did not wish to be identified.
“In a similar
manner, we lost production at the mines of Lakhanpur, also in MCL where
we cut back our production from a potential of 40,000 tonnes daily to
2,000 tonnes just because the clearances were not in place,” sources
said, adding that nearly 3.75 million tonnes was lost in this case.
Chasing
a stiff target of 507 million tonnes in the current fiscal, CIL has
decided to pursue the respective State governments for the clearances,
which are often delayed due to bureaucratic reasons.
No comments:
Post a Comment