BAGHDAD:
Militants gained ground on Monday in a battle for a strategic enclave in
northern Iraq that provides a corridor to Syria, officials and
residents said.
Security forces insisted they had
repelled an assault on Tal Afar, a Turkman-majority town in Nineveh
province, but multiple officials and a resident said militants had
entered it, with one saying they were in control.
"Armed
groups managed to take control of Tal Afar," a Nineveh provincial
government official told, speaking on condition of anonymity.
"They clashed with security forces and (tribal fighters), who had to withdraw from the town."
Resident
Mohammed Khalil said militants had taken several districts but not the
entire town, and added that families were fleeing to nearby Sinjar
between Tal Afar and the Syrian border.
The local official
responsible for the town and surrounding areas, Abdulal Abbas, declined
to say whether it was now in militant control, but said Tal Afar was
dealing with "martyrs, wounded, chaos and refugees".
Abbas said 200,000 people -- nearly half the area´s population -- had fled, and asked for international assistance.
Tal
Afar, a major Shiite-majority town in otherwise Sunni Arab and
Kurdish-dominated Nineveh province, had briefly held off a militant
offensive that saw fighters led by the Islamic State of Iraq and the
Levant (ISIL) group take control of vast swathes of territory of north
and north-central Iraq in a matter of days.
The town has provided a crucial bulwark against militant-controlled territory on either side of Iraq´s border with Syria.
Interior
ministry spokesman Brigadier General Saad Maan, however, insisted that
militants had not encroached on the town, proclaiming that fighters "do
not control one metre (yard) of Tal Afar".
ISLAMABAD:
Jamiat Ulema-e-Islam-Sami chief and head of the Taliban negotiating team
Maulana Samiul Haq has said that the entire nation is fed up with war
and wanted peace, respite and harmony to prevail.
Addressing
a ‘Dastarbandi’ ceremony in Abbottabad on Monday, Maulana Sami berated
the so-called religious factions, liberal and secular lobbies, defence
and political observers, analysts, and columnists on ‘Wwestern payroll’,
urging an imminent military operation within Pakistan.
“All
these fantasy weavers should be made a brigade and sent to fight a war
against the Taliban so that they should be able to satisfy their ‘lust
for war’; instead of bothering the brave Army soldiers being ruthlessly
sacrificed in the line of duty,” he said.
Maulana Sami
lauded the nation and rulers for understanding the sensitive nature of
the situation, opting for the prudent path of dialogue. He also called
on all “to also pray fervently for saving the Federation from all kinds
of conspiracies and odds”.
Sonam Kapoor can be expected to turn a politician, for the adaptation of Anuja Chauhan’s book, Battle For Bittora, whose rights have been bought by Anil Kapoor Productions.
When asked, Sonam said, “We’ve just bought the rights of the book, but
haven’t begun work on the script. So, nothing has been finalised yet.
Hopefully, I’m going to start shooting for that film by the end of the
year.” Rhea Kapoor has also confirmed that they would be producing the
film under Anil Kapoor Productions. Battle For Bittora is a
humourous account of young India. It’s about a girl who lives in Mumbai
and works in a animation studio, perfectly happy with her carefree,
independent existence. That’s when her grandmother shows up and tells
her to contest the upcoming elections from their hometown Bittora. She
soon starts wearing cotton saris and frumpy blouses, battling
accusations from
other politicians.
And while there’s still time for Kapoor to begin shooting for this film,
she already seems to have begun the prep work for Arbaaz Khan’s Dolly Ki Doli
where she’ll be seen opposite Pulkit Samrat and Rajkummar Rao. The
actress has been speaking a lot more Hindi, and using words like ‘hum’
instead of ‘main’. “I already seem to be in the Dolly Ki Doli
mode,” laughs Kapoor who is playing a Punjabi girl in the film. And
about Sooraj Barjatya’s film opposite Salman Khan, she clarifies, “We’re
still in discussions and it’s too early to talk about that film.”
Apart from these films, she’ll also be seen in Khubsoorat remake, the shooting of which has been wrapped up already.
Aditya Roy Kapur in Shuddhi?
After Hrithik Roshan’s exit from Shuddhi, there has been a
lot of speculation about who will replace him. Though Ranveer Singh’s
name had cropped up as a likely contender for the role, the actor denied
that he is part of the film. Now, we hear that Aditya Roy Kapur is
being considered to play the main lead in the Karan Malhotra helmed
project. Though producer Karan Johar said that the final cast will be
announced soon, the film is slated to release on Christmas 2015. The
grapevine also suggests that Deepika Padukone has been finalised to play
the female lead. Meanwhile, Johar also confirmed that the film will
roll in a few months. When we messaged Karan Johar, he did not revert.
There are three core factors that led to the chaos:
First is a broken promise between a leader and his citizens: President Viktor F. Yanukovych
had long promised to integrate Ukraine with the European Union by
signing sweeping political and trade agreements. In November, he refused
to sign.
Second
is a lingering Cold War-era fight between Russia and the West for
influence over countries in Eastern Europe still suffering from
political and economic problems rooted in the Soviet era. While Europe
and the United States have made a priority of fostering democracy in the
former Soviet republics, the Kremlin sees an ulterior motive: the
expansion of Western military and economic power. Perceiving a threat to
its big military and economic interests in Ukraine, Russia exerted
enormous pressure to scuttle the accords with the European Union.
Photo
Launch media viewer
Demonstrators rode a military vehicle to Independence Square in central Kiev. Protesters claimed control of the city’s security.Credit
Louisa Gouliamaki/Agence France-Presse — Getty Images
Third
is searing public outrage over the government’s sometimes brutal
response to the street protests that followed the president’s about-face
on ties with the European Union. The crackdowns deeply contradicted
Ukraine’s post-Soviet national identity as a peaceful, pluralistic
society. Even in the 2004 Orange Revolution, in which there were also huge street demonstrations, the authorities did not assault the protesters.
Now, a quick recap of how recent events unfolded.
In 2009, the European Union initiated an Eastern Partnership program to tighten ties with former Soviet republics, including Ukraine. Russia immediately registered alarm.
“Some states view this partnership as a partnership against Russia,”
said Dmitri A. Medvedev, then the president and now prime minister.
Russia
had serious reasons for unease. Its Black Sea naval fleet is based in
Ukraine, and crucial pipelines in Ukraine carry Russian natural gas
to customers in Europe. European officials repeatedly dismissed
Russia’s concerns in what in hindsight they viewed as a serious
miscalculation given Russia’s control over Ukraine’s gas supply, and
eastern Ukraine’s heavy dependence on Russia for business and trade.
Ukraine
has long been caught between Europe and Russia, and Mr. Yanukovych,
elected in 2010, had tried to strike a balance even as his own Eastern
Ukrainian, Russian-speaking heritage seemed to place him personally
closer to Moscow.
Many
Ukrainians, especially in the Western part of the country, saw the
accords with Europe as symbolic of a larger push to improve their lives
with much-needed reforms especially to the economy and the justice
system. In March 2013, Mr. Yanukovych published a decree directing the government to work toward signing the accords.
Street
protests erupted in late November, when it became clear that Mr.
Yanukovych would not move forward. At several critical junctures, the
rallies seemed about to taper off, especially after Russia gave Mr. Yanukovych $15 billion in loans and natural gas discounts, only to then be reignited by government missteps.
These
included the beating by the police of young protesters on Nov. 30,
which prompted demonstrators to seize public buildings and occupy
Independence Square, as well as the ramming through of new laws severely
restricting free speech and assembly.
The
protests turned deadly as demonstrators, furious over the legislation,
threw firebombs at the police and the authorities responded in some
cases with gunfire. Mr. Yanukovych tried to stem the violence by firing
the government, but calls for his own resignation grew louder anyway.
Tensions
simmered until last week when it seemed Parliament might squelch a deal
to reverse constitutional changes that had expanded presidential powers
earlier in Mr. Yanukovych’s term. Demonstrators marched toward
Parliament, setting off what quickly became the most violent clashes
yet.