ISLAMABAD:
No Chief of Army Staff (COAS) has held so many meetings with a prime
minister in such a short span of time as General Raheel Sharif has had
with Nawaz Sharif in just four months but still meeting of the minds on
Pervez Musharraf’s fate is missing.
This is indicative
of the fact that though the two Sharifs have met for a number of times,
they have not held even a slight discussion on the former general’s
future.Both apparently consciously avoided touching this subject for
their own reasons and restricted their deliberations to only burning
national issues specifically security matters, terrorism and peace talks
with the Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP).
All together,
the Sharif duo has met for some half a dozen times since the new army
chief took command of the Pakistan Army in November last. Since then,
Nawaz Sharif has been abroad on official tours for nearly a month, which
means that the prime minister and the COAS have held meetings at least
twice a month which is a very good frequency keeping in view the record
of the sessions between such position holders in the past.
This
regularity, generally speaking, signals the impression that all’s well
as the two top guns sit together and positively work to thrash out
issues, sharing views on almost all matters that have the potential of
marring their relations.
They met in December, January,
February and March, and are expected to be under one roof once again
four days later on April 19 at the Pakistan Military Academy Kakul
passing out parade where the prime minister will be the chief guest.
They may hold a session even before that.
Almost every
time, the two chiefs met, senior cabinet ministers and other top
officials harped on the theme that the government and the army are on
the same page on all critical issues. This was always taken as a
positive development in a country where they have usually been holding
conflicting stands.
Intensive interactions no doubt help
remove misgivings and misunderstandings apart from helping formulation
of consensus policies. But although the two sides have been frequently
meeting, they have not been on the same wavelength and have not
developed the desired rapport on the Musharraf saga otherwise General
Raheel Sharif would not have deemed it necessary to issue his famous
public statement, prompting some elements, who dream of rocking the
relations between the two for their ulterior motives, to paint it as a
storm.
All the soldiers’ concerns that the general wanted
to address through his public remarks could have been discussed with the
prime minister and an easy way-out would have been conveniently found
to remove them.
Interpretations of the chief’s comment are
galore. One most mooted and plausible puts it as a reaction to some
statements of two Khawajas, Defence Minister M Asif and Railways
Minister Saad Rafique.
Instead of going public, the best
option was to point out to the prime minister their “irresponsible
attack” that may have demoralised the soldiers fighting on different
fronts, and get it stopped
General Raheel Sharif has just
started his three-year tenure as the army chief. Never before has any of
his predecessors issued such a statement after just first four months
of assuming office. Regardless of what other highly placed government
functionaries have stated, Interior Minister Chaudhry Nisar Ali Khan
turned out to be more forthcoming, honest and saner when he admitted the
row, though temporarily, which he hoped would go not without much
difficulty.
The COAS has made it a point to take some
other generals including Ashfaque Nadeem, the Chief of General Staff,
and Zaheerul Islam, the Director General of the Inter-Services
Intelligence (ISI) in some high-level meetings with the prime minister,
who was assisted by his close aides.
Apart from the
elaborate contacts the prime minister has had with the army chief,
Chaudhry Nisar too has been having comprehensive interactions with the
top men of the security establishment including the ISI chief for
consultations on the peace talks and other matters.
At no
stage has the government gone solo on the question of the dialogue
process. It constituted the first committee after talking to the army.
Again, it consulted the force when it formed the second body. Thus,
there has been no breaking of communication on this critical issue. But
still some people, who pose themselves to be speaking on behalf of the
security establishment, have been asserting that the army is annoyed
over the release of some Taliban prisoners.
However, even
if the government has wanted to free any such inmates, it can’t do so
because all of them are in the custody of the army. Rebutting this
vicious campaign, the interior minister has to say that the 19 Taliban
prisoners were set free after consultations with the army.
If
Nawaz Sharif indeed needs to rein in some of his ministers from
unnecessary haranguing against Musharraf that is taken as criticism on
the army, Raheel Sharif is required to hold back those elements in
different agencies. Both have equal bigger responsibility to nip the
evil of fueling confrontation in the bud. Everyone is well aware that
Pakistan’s plate is full of paramount problems and it can’t brook any
adventurism.