NEW
DELHI — India’s naval chief resigned on Wednesday after a Russian-made
Indian submarine caught fire off the coast of Mumbai, injuring seven
officers and leaving two missing. It was the 10th accident involving an
Indian warship in seven months.
The
submarine, Sindhuratna, was forced to surface after smoke was detected
on board, the government said in a statement. Seven crew members were
airlifted from the submarine and admitted to a hospital in Mumbai, where
they were in stable condition, said Narendra Vispute, a spokesman for
the Indian Navy. Two other crew members were missing, “and all efforts
are in progress to locate them,” the statement said.
After
the accident, Adm. D. K. Joshi, chief of the Indian naval staff,
submitted his resignation, “taking moral responsibility for the
accidents and incidents which have taken place during the past few
months,” the statement said. The government accepted his resignation and
will appoint a new naval chief.
The fire on the Sindhuratna came six months after another Russian-made submarine, the Sindhurakshak, exploded and sank while docked in Mumbai, killing 18 crew members, the worst maritime loss in India in four decades.
India’s
navy is widely considered the most professional of the country’s three
military services, but the mounting toll from accidents has tarnished
that image. At a news conference this month, Defense Minister A. K.
Antony expressed confidence that the navy was correcting any
deficiencies.
“There
are some failures, but on the whole, the military — whether army, navy
or air force — they are taking strong actions,” he said.
The
Sindhuratna is a Kilo-class diesel submarine commissioned in 1988 that
was berthed next to the Sindhurakshak when the Sindhurakshak sank in
August. At the time, the Sindhuratna was thought to have sustained only
minor damage.
Some
Indian naval officers suspect that the repeated accidents have resulted
less from poor training than from the navy’s aging Russian equipment.
“The
Russian defense manufacturing system is decrepit, unreliable and
corrupt,” Arun Prakash, a retired admiral, said. “The navy has to take a
deep and hard look at its equipment.”
The
Indian Navy has been trying to break its dependence on Russian
equipment for years, but its efforts have not been entirely successful. A
cooperative effort with France and Spain to build a new class of
conventional submarine called the Scorpene has been delayed, and the
first submarines are not expected to be ready before 2015.
India
is building dozens of other warships, but many of the projects rely on
Russian equipment. And a refurbished aircraft carrier that India
recently purchased from Russia has had its own share of problems,
including breakdowns in its boilers.
At
any given time, India has just five or six operational submarines,
considered far too few to guard the country’s extensive coastline.
“Delays
in the acquisition of new submarines, coupled with a deficient and
aging fleet of submarines, are taking its toll on the operational
capabilities of the Indian Navy,” Sameer Patil, an associate fellow at
Gateway House, a foreign policy think tank based in Mumbai, said in a
statement.
India
wants to play a substantial role in the changing naval dynamics of the
Indian Ocean, where China has been increasingly assertive. But the
recent accidents could hinder those efforts, said Deva Mohanty, a
defense analyst.
“India
is a major player in the regional maritime security construct,” Mr.
Mohanty said. “So these kinds of accidents, both minor and major, are a
concern.”
No comments:
Post a Comment