KIEV,
Ukraine — The papers were first spotted swirling in the eddies of a
boat harbor on the sprawling compound of the former Ukrainian president,
Viktor F. Yanukovych, on the outskirts of Kiev. Intrigued, the
protesters-turned-security guards who had taken over the grounds found a
raft and began fishing the documents out of the water. Later, they
recruited a diver to retrieve sunken nylon bags of files from the
riverbed.
What
they found were the waterlogged secrets of a government that nobody was
ever supposed to lay eyes on, dumped by the president and his
associates in the panicked last hours of his tenure, before he fled in a
helicopter to eastern Ukraine.
The
documents, which are still being dried out, along with others from the
lavish home of the prosecutor general, are being posted on the Internet
in Cyrillic for all to see. Together, they provide an increasingly
detailed portrait of the final desperate weeks, days and hours of
members of a besieged inner circle trying desperately to maintain their
grip on a government they had plundered to an extent that shocked even
corruption-weary Ukrainians.
They
reveal details both mundane and alarming, showing in one instance how
the private zoo, golf course and other luxuries on the president’s
estate were paid for, and detailing in another plans — never carried out
— to mobilize the army to clear protesters from the capital. Some were
merely curious: From the river emerged the soggy titles to two Mercedes
cars in the name of the woman suspected of being the mistress of the
president, Lyubov Polezhay, a sister of the presidential cook.
The
papers, some charred from a hurried attempt to destroy them, depict
back-room efforts to control the domestic news media and
behind-the-scenes efforts of the government to find support both in
Washington and Moscow. They seem to show that Mr. Yanukovych financed
his opulent lifestyle by dipping into the profits of a coal trading
enterprise.
In
the final months, the documents show, Mr. Yanukovych’s government
reached out to a former deputy director of Russia’s military
intelligence service in planning the crackdown on protesters. Years
earlier, they show, the government paid American legal advisers for
opinions that would justify to the West the prosecution of Yulia V.
Tymoshenko, a former prime minister and the president’s chief political
opponent.
It
had been known that the law firm of Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher &
Flom had compiled a largely sympathetic report in 2012 on the
government’s prosecution of Ms. Tymoshenko, even though most impartial
observers say it was politically motivated.
Over
the weekend, however, street fighters found documents related to this
prestigious American law firm’s work in an unexpected spot: on the tiled
floor of the sauna in an opulent residence of the deposed prosecutor
general, Viktor Pshonka.
For
local journalists, who have been busy organizing the documents and
posting them online, the troves have been an embarrassment of riches.
“What
they didn’t manage to burn they threw in the water,” said Serhi
Scherbyna, the editor of The Insider, an online investigative journalism
website, who said he found irrefutable proof linking the coal trading
enterprise that won about $1.5 billion in government contracts last year
to the company that managed the presidential estate, its private golf
course and zoo.
“I
wasn’t surprised at all,” he said. “I’ve lost so much of my health
trying to prove this connection. As a journalist, I felt satisfied. I
could finally prove the theories I had put forward. As a man, I felt I
had been lied to. I was holding in my hand proof. It was the feeling of a
scientist who has proven his theory with evidence.”
By
Tuesday, journalists had photographed all of the approximately 20,000
soggy pages and posted them on a WikiLeaks-like website, Yanukovychleaks.org.
Elsewhere,
the paper trail left by fleeing officials pointed to a role for a
Russian military adviser, a former deputy head of the G.R.U. military
intelligence service, in the plan to secure the government district of
the capital and to clear Independence Square of the protesters who had
built formidable barricades there during a three-month occupation. The
security forces had two plans, called Operation Boomerang and Operation
Wave, according to the papers, released to local news media by a member
of Parliament.
Any
role for even a former Russian security official in advising on the
location of snipers, the arming of police with lethal ammunition and the
issuing of rules of engagement to defend the government buildings is
extraordinarily sensitive here after scores of street fighters armed
mostly with clubs died in fighting with police officers last week.
Among
the more curious documents to turn up here was a letter translated into
Russian from Gregory B. Craig, President Obama’s former White House
counsel and a lawyer at Skadden working on the report on the Tymoshenko
case, to Paul J. Manafort, a Republican political operative who had
advised Mr. Yanukovych going back to 2007. It was found in a box of
papers in the sauna. In the letter
dated Aug. 24, 2012, Mr. Craig was asking for Mr. Manafort’s assistance
in obtaining from the Ukrainian government documents for the report
Skadden was preparing on the prosecution of Ms. Tymoshenko. The report
concluded that the prosecution was procedurally flawed but not
politically motivated, as it is widely believed to have been.
Much work lies ahead in studying the papers, said the nongovernmental groups and reporters here who have set about doing so.
The
papers in the sauna, for example, included an early draft of Skadden’s
report that had been annotated by Ukrainian government officials, who
appeared to be pushing the Americans for a more sympathetic
interpretation of the case; careful study is needed to determine how
much the law firm yielded to these demands in the final report, said
Mustafa Nayiem, an investigative journalist with the newspaper Ukrainska
Pravda.
In
a statement issued Wednesday, Skadden said that the Ukrainian Ministry
of Justice had retained its lawyers and that “Skadden agreed to write
this report on the express condition that the law firm would be totally
independent.”
No comments:
Post a Comment