ISLAMABAD:
In response to the cable operators’ bogus excuses that they cannot show
Geo because of security threats, a Jang Group spokesman has come up with
a rejoinder.
The spokesman said it is a bogus excuse
and a total lie. The incident in Sadiqabad was also totally
stage-managed to create this excuse. No one threatens these cable
operators when they show round-the-clock illegal Indian dances. No one
threatens these cable operators when they show channels that have shown
blasphemous content 60 times more than Geo.
The spokesman
said as many as five channels also faced many court cases and police
action in this regard but surprisingly, the cable operators do not
receive threats for showing these channels. Even before Geo has shown
it, two leading channels have already aired it many times.
The
spokesman said a security threat was also raised as an excuse during
the last government when cable operators suspended transmission of Geo
News. The excuse of a security threat then was exposed as completely
bogus when the Supreme Court of Pakistan told chairman Pemra that he
could not leave the courtroom till the Geo News transmission was
restored by cable operators all over the country. The result was that
within three hours, Geo News’ transmission was restored all over the
country.
The spokesman said cable operators, just like
broadcasters, are operating on the basis of a licence that they have
applied for and that Pemra has granted them. The basic term of the
license is that no cable operator can itself suspend or disrupt
transmission of a licensed channel unless Pemra directs it to do so. If a
cable operator violates this term of licence, its licence is liable to
be revoked. Even if security threat is accepted as genuine, this cannot
be used as an excuse for a cable operator to violate the term of their
licence by illegally suspending Geo’s transmission.
“What
if a duly licensed mobile phone company suspends its mobile phone
network for a week and uses security threat as an excuse when PTA wants
to suspend its licence? What if a duly licensed commercial bank shuts
down all its operations all over the country and uses security threat as
an excuse when State Bank of Pakistan wants to suspend its licence? And
what about our police that face life threat on a daily basis? Can
police officers remain at home drawing the salaries on the pretext that
they are facing security threats? And what about courts and honourable
judges, especially those of lower courts, who are expected to try and
convict dangerous criminals and terrorists?” the spokesman said.
He
reminded that when Chief Justice of Balochistan High Court Qazi Faiz
Isa summoned journalists and editors of all the newspapers of
Balochistan and questioned them as to why they were publishing versions
of terrorists, who claimed responsibility of killing policemen. When
publishers of those newspapers produced before him evidence of serious
threat that they are facing in Balochistan, Chief Justice Qazi Faiz Isa
gave them a long summon. He said that don’t publish any newspaper if you
cannot face any threat. He said if security threat is accepted as a
valid excuse to break the law then there will be anarchy all over the
country. The chief justice also said that if security threat is valid
then he and his fellow judges in Balochistan should stop hearing cases
and dispensing justice just because their lives were threatened.
The
spokesman said the cable operators have decided to do their business in
Pakistan within the prevailing environment. They cannot pretend that
they are working in some European country. Lawyers, judges, police etc.
everyone is facing security threat in Pakistan these days. This does not
exempt people to just violate their legal obligation and use security
threat as an excuse.
He said Geo itself received a most
direct and serious threat in writing from terrorists who wanted their
version and their ideology to be properly broadcasted. “Just because it
received the threat, can Geo broadcast TTP’s version when it is
murdering and beheading our soldiers? Will its licence not be liable to
be revoked? Can any channel in Pakistan start showing TTP’s version
round the clock just because it is facing security threats?”
The
spokesman further said even if the threat being faced by cable
operators is genuine, then it has nothing to do between cable operation
(the licensee) and Pemra (the licensor) for correct and legal position
is if any cable operator violates terms of its licence, e.g. by keeping
transmission of Geo suspended when Pemra has directed them to show it,
its licence is liable to be revoked. If a cable operator is receiving
life threat because of some business dispute or professional rivalry or
from some extortionist or criminals or even because of showing any
channel of Geo, it is a matter between cable operator and police. If
they are facing any threat then they should seek help from police and
pursue remedies through law enforcing agencies. Instead of the path
provided under the law they cannot just suspend valid transmission of
Geo and thus violate a direction of Pemra.
The spokesman
said suspension of Geo News by Pemra ended two weeks ago and Pemra has
never suspended Geo Kahani and Geo Tez. Despite this, Geo News is either
not being shown in 80 per cent areas of Pakistan or it has been pushed
to last channels where it is difficult/impossible for viewers to find.
Geo Kahani and Geo Tez are also not being shown.
He said
the cable operators are deliberately refusing to show channels of Geo
because they are being threatened for showing channels of Geo.The
federal government and Pemra have only two options. Either what cable
operators are claiming is a lie in which case they must take action
against them to restore transmission of all Geo channels. Or if the
federal government and Pemra believe that the excuse of cable operators
regarding security threat is genuine they must make a candid public
admission of it:
“a. All cable operators are liable to show Geo channels;
b. 80 percent cable operators are not showing it because some hidden force is threatening all of them from doing so;
c.
There is nothing that the federal government can do about it because it
simply has no writ to do anything about the people who are threatening
cable operators.”
After that, at least Geo can claim compensation for the government’s failure to fulfil its obligations.
On
the cable operators excuse that they are showing Geo at last numbers
because it is their discretion on which number to show it and also that
number of TV channels that have been licensed by Pemra is far in excess
of the capacity of TV sets owned by ordinary people, the spokesman
reminded that in 2010, when hearing a petition of Geo, honourable
Supreme Court set up a one-member media commission to look, among other
things, into the issue of shuffling and placement of channels. According
to the commission report, cable operators are constitutionally required
to show TV channels having nationwide viewership at starting numbers.
This was a constitutional requirement and the right of the viewers. The
commission also found that shuffling of channels, disrupting their
signals, throwing them at last numbers etc. was illegal. The honourable
Supreme Court adopted that report and made it part of its judgment.
In
the latest petition of Geo News, honourable Supreme Court has once
again reproduced from 2010 judgment and from the Media Commission Report
and disposed off Geo News’ petition only when Pemra undertook to
restore the channel to its original position. So it is not up to
discretion of cable operators to decide to show Geo News at No. 3
position today and No. 93 tomorrow. According to the Supreme Court
judgment each cable operator has a constitutional obligation to show Geo
News and all Geo channels at their original starting numbers.
The
spokesman said Pemra’s direction to cable operators also requires each
licensee cable operator to restore Geo news transmission at its original
position. This also shows that the discussion of their own discretion
and capacity of TV set is bogus and mala fide.
The
spokesman said all cable operators were showing Geo channels at certain
numbers on 19th April. “Why is it that after Pemra received a complaint
about Geo following attack on Hamid Mir on 19th April, cable operators
are either blocking its transmission or are making every kind of excuse
not to show it at its original position? Why is it all of a sudden cable
operators are using excuses such as it being a matter of their own
discretion and that TV sets do not have capacity to show all the
licensed channels when there was no such talk before 19th April 2014?”
The
spokesman said the original scheme put in place through Pemra Ordinance
for regulation of electronic industry anticipated and sought to prevent
this very problem by barring any broadcasters from owning or
controlling a cable business and vice versa. The implementers of the
scheme were aware that even if one TV broadcaster were given control
over cable operation, it would use that power to damage competitors in
the same way that the Geo’s competitors are doing today.
The
spokesman said the real problem is that one media group that owns one
news channel has purchased or, directly or indirectly, concluded a
business deal with cable operators in the country while apparently cable
operators are still continuing with their previous names and owners, in
reality they are in the hands of one media group, the owner of which is
openly boasting that Geo is finished, “I will keep Geo channels off air
and because of lack of viewership they will not get any advertisements
and they will go bankrupt anytime now.” The spokesman said all cable
operators led by Khalid Arain are now employees of that group and they
only do and say what the owner of that group instructs them to do.
Both
Khalid Arain and owner of the media group use the name of hidden hands
to get the Geo closed. They claim that they are acting on behalf of
hidden hands. They also arrange meetings of cable operators with hidden
hands.
The spokesman said if the apex court forms a
commission, many secrets will come to the fore. He said the Pemra and
the federal government are fully aware about the above dangerous
development and are yet avoiding doing anything about it.